GEON
GEON vs Otterly.AI
Otterly has the lowest entry price in this category by a wide margin. The comparison worth making is not $29 against $99, but what each price actually buys once you add the engines you need.
Short answer: Otterly at $29/mo is the cheapest way to start, with a real free trial and an excellent Claude Skill. Its base plan covers four engines and charges extra for Gemini and Claude on every tier. GEON is $99/mo with six engines included and per-scan confidence reporting.
| GEON | Otterly.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $99/mo | $29/mo (15 prompts) |
| Engines in base plan | 6 | 4 |
| Claude | Included | Paid add-on on every tier |
| Gemini | Included | Paid add-on on every tier |
| Grok / DeepSeek | Included | Not covered |
| Free trial | Free tier | 7 days, 50 prompts |
| Sampling | 3 runs per scan, confidence labelled | Once daily, all plans |
| API access | MCP from $99 | From $189/mo |
| Claude Skill | No | Yes, dedicated |
The $29 plan is genuinely useful — with limits
Otterly's Lite plan covers 15 prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, refreshed daily, for $29/mo. There is a real 7-day trial with 50 prompts and no sales call. For finding out whether AI visibility matters for your category at all, that is the most sensible starting point in this market and we'd rather say so than pretend otherwise.
The limits show up as you get serious. Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every tier, not just the cheapest one. There is no DeepSeek or Grok coverage. API access starts at the $189 tier. And 15 prompts covers one narrow topic — most teams tracking a category properly need several times that.
Where the two products differ in kind
Otterly reports one reading per prompt per engine per day, uniformly across plans. GEON takes three measurements per scan and labels each result low, medium or high confidence. That matters because AI answers vary between identical queries — without a stability signal, a single reading can look like a change when it's noise.
GEON also runs a technical AI-readiness audit alongside the monitoring: whether robots.txt allows the current crawler names, whether pages render without JavaScript, whether structured data and the sitemap are in order. Otterly ships GEO URL audits too, so this is a difference of depth rather than presence.
What Otterly does better
The dedicated Claude Skill is the standout. Alongside an MCP server, Otterly ships a Claude-specific integration that no one else here matches — if your team works primarily inside Claude, that's a real workflow advantage.
Their published country coverage is also more thorough than ours: 65+ countries with per-engine availability documented, including Turkey with Google AI Overviews explicitly marked unsupported there. That kind of specificity is unusual and useful.
Worth knowing before you rely on it: their own site describes citation tracking as weekly in one place and daily in another. Worth confirming with them if that cadence matters to your use case.
Frequently asked questions
Is Otterly.AI good value at $29/mo?
Yes, for starting out. It covers 15 prompts across four engines with daily refresh and a real free trial. Budget for add-ons if you need Gemini or Claude, since those cost extra on every tier.
Does Otterly track Claude?
As a paid add-on, priced per tier, rather than in the base plan. GEON includes Claude at $99/mo with no add-on.
Which supports Turkey better?
Otterly documents Turkey among 65+ supported countries, noting Google AI Overviews is unavailable there, but its interface is English-only. GEON has a full Turkish interface and Turkish-language scanning. If you need the product itself in Turkish, GEON; if you need documented per-country engine availability, Otterly's is more detailed.
Can I use either from inside Claude?
Both ship MCP servers. Otterly also has a dedicated Claude Skill, which is a smoother path if Claude is your main working environment. GEON's MCP is included from the $99 plan; Otterly's API access starts at $189.
Get a free AI visibility report